Informationally Redundant Utterances Elicit Pragmatic Inferences
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Informationally Redundant Utterances Alter Prior Beliefs about Event Typicality
Most theories of pragmatics and language processing predict that speakers avoid excessive informational redundancy in order to conserve unnecessary cognitive or articulatory effort. Informationally redundant utterances are, however, quite common in natural dialog. From a comprehension standpoint, it remains unclear how listeners interpret these utterances, and whether they make attempts to reco...
متن کاملSemantically underinformative utterances trigger pragmatic inferences
Most theories of pragmatics and language processing predict that speakers avoid informationally redundant utterances. From a processing standpoint, it remains unclear what happens when listeners encounter such utterances, and how they interpret them. We argue that uninformative utterances can trigger pragmatic inferences, which increase utterance utility in line with listener expectations. In t...
متن کاملA Uniform Treatment of Pragmatic Inferences in Simple and Complex Utterances and Sequences of Utterances
Drawing appropriate defeasible inferences has been proven to be one of the most pervasive puzzles of natural language processing and a recurrent problem in pragmatics. This paper provides a theoretical framework, called stratified logic, that can accommodate defeasible pragmatic inferences. The framework yields an algorithm that computes the conversational, conventional, scalar, clausal, and no...
متن کاملThe Pragmatic Validation of Utterances
The semantic validation of utterances as true or false is known in logic and linguistics. However, linguistic messages are validated not only on the semantic but also on the pragmatic level. In most linguistic studies, pragmatics is defined mostly as the interrelation between speakers and is considered as a mere supplement to semantics. In our approach (we call MIC : meta-informative centering ...
متن کاملRemembering Pragmatic Inferences
After hearing that ‘the flimsy shelf weakened under the weight of the books,’ people often remember having heard that the shelf broke–an inference that is not logically necessitated by the statement. Indeed, when asked to choose which word was heard—weakened or broke—people often mistakenly choose broke, a pragmatic inference, as having been heard (McDermott & Chan, 2006). On what basis are the...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Social Science Research Network
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1556-5068']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3985201